Comparison of Lao-tzu and Machiavelli Essays -- Political Philosophers

Comparison of Lao-tzu and MachiavelliLao-tzu and Machiavelli are political philosophers writingin two different lands and two different times. Lao-tzu wasan ancient Chinese philosopher from sixth century BC, theauthor of Tao-te Ching, and Machiavelli was an Italian philosopher who lived 2000 years after Lao-tzus time,author of Prince. They are both philosophers but have totally different perspective on how to be a good leader. While both philosophers writing is instructive. Lao-tzus advice issues from detached view of a universal ruler Machiavellis advice is in truth personal perhaps de adult maleding. Both philosophers idea will not work for like a shots world, because that modern world is not as perfect as Lao-tzu described in Tao-te Ching, and not as chaotic as Machiavelli illustrated in Prince. Perhaps Lao-tzu and Machivellis political system will not work for todays world, but some of their philosophies are still exist in some of modern issues. One of those issues is gun contro l, which has become a dividing line in America. Lao-tzu advised in Tao-te Ching weapon are the tools of violence all decent man detest them. Weapon are the tools of fear a decent man will avoid them except in the direst necessity and, if compelled, will use them only with the utmost restraint. On the other hand Machiavelli wrote in Prince, Francesco Sforza became Duke of Milan from being a private citizen because he was armed his sons, since they avoided the inconveniences of arms, bec...